↓ Brittni Tonnessen ↓ -283.5 ELO ↓ Katherine Allan ↓ -208.2 ELO ↓ Sydney Sonday ↓ -197.9 ELO 🎯 77.5% Model Accuracy · 218 matches 👑 Anna Leigh Waters · 2069 ELO 👑 Ben Johns · 2015 ELO 👑 Andrei Daescu · 1931 ELO 👑 Anna Bright · 1902 ELO 👑 Gabriel Tardio · 1895 ELO ↓ Brittni Tonnessen ↓ -283.5 ELO ↓ Katherine Allan ↓ -208.2 ELO ↓ Sydney Sonday ↓ -197.9 ELO 🎯 77.5% Model Accuracy · 218 matches 👑 Anna Leigh Waters · 2069 ELO 👑 Ben Johns · 2015 ELO 👑 Andrei Daescu · 1931 ELO 👑 Anna Bright · 1902 ELO 👑 Gabriel Tardio · 1895 ELO
Home
Compare Play Players Rankings
Schedule Next: MLP Dallas (Playoffs) · Pre Today's Picks Brackets Drama Desk MLP Orlando Recap MLP Chicago Recap MLP San Diego Recap MLP Grand Rapids Recap MLP New York Recap
DinkCoins My Positions Markets Pickleball Betting Guide Leaderboard
Trades Rosters Power Rankings Team Compare Draft Hub Big Board Draft Simulator Keeper Tracker
Sheet Ratings Power Ratings Predictions Sharp Sheet Bracket Sim Track Record Clutch & PDI Volatility Strength of Schedule Upset & Rest Calibration About the Model
↑↓ navigateEnter goEsc close
Projected Picks

MLP Austin — Bracket Predictions

Five pro draws, current bracket paths, and Sheet Rating probabilities. This reads like a pick sheet first; the full model path is one click deeper.

Official Brackets Today's Picks Market Desk
Men's Doubles
Gabriel Tardio / Hayden Patriquin
SR 1958 · Strong
Women's Doubles
Anna Leigh Waters / Jorja Johnson
SR 1933 · Lean
Mixed Doubles
Anna Bright / Hayden Patriquin
SR 1911 · Thin edge
How To Read This

Projected path, not official result

The winner card is the model's bracket pick. Final confidence below 60% is a thin edge, 60-69% is a lean, and 70%+ is strong. Official brackets remain the source of truth.

Generated Aug 4, 8:15 PM EDT mlp_orlando_draws.json
Market Read

Start with uncertainty

Close finals and upset paths are better prediction-market candidates than obvious favorites. Use the path button on each draw to see where the model thinks pressure shows up.

Men's Doubles
Gabriel Tardio / Hayden Patriquin Is the Model's Pick
Projected final: Gabriel Tardio / Hayden Patriquin over Max Freeman / Ben Johns at 72.4% model confidence. That grades as strong, so treat the draw with the right amount of uncertainty.
Winner
Gabriel Tardio / Hayden Patriquin
SR 1958 · Strong final confidence >
The model projects Gabriel Tardio / Hayden Patriquin through a final against Max Freeman / Ben Johns with 72.4% final-match confidence. This is a probability read, not a certainty.
Finalist
Max Freeman / Ben Johns
Projected runner-up path >
Max Freeman / Ben Johns reaches the final in the model path. This is a clean name to track for market questions and upset exposure.
Semifinalists
Noe Khlif / Federico Staksrud / Christian Alshon / Riley Newman
Late-round pressure spots >
Noe Khlif / Federico Staksrud and Christian Alshon / Riley Newman appear in the projected semifinal path, which is where the bracket starts producing useful market tension.
Dark Horse
Hayden Patriquin / Gabriel Tardio
Upset or contender watch >
Hayden Patriquin / Gabriel Tardio is the name the model surfaces outside the obvious final path. Worth watching before prices harden.
Markets Official bracket
Women's Doubles
Anna Leigh Waters / Jorja Johnson Is the Model's Pick
Projected final: Anna Leigh Waters / Jorja Johnson over Anna Bright / Kate Fahey at 67.2% model confidence. That grades as lean, so treat the draw with the right amount of uncertainty.
Winner
Anna Leigh Waters / Jorja Johnson
SR 1933 · Lean final confidence >
The model projects Anna Leigh Waters / Jorja Johnson through a final against Anna Bright / Kate Fahey with 67.2% final-match confidence. This is a probability read, not a certainty.
Finalist
Anna Bright / Kate Fahey
Projected runner-up path >
Anna Bright / Kate Fahey reaches the final in the model path. This is a clean name to track for market questions and upset exposure.
Semifinalists
Catherine Parenteau / Jade Kawamoto / Alex Walker / Lacy Schneemann
Late-round pressure spots >
Catherine Parenteau / Jade Kawamoto and Alex Walker / Lacy Schneemann appear in the projected semifinal path, which is where the bracket starts producing useful market tension.
Dark Horse
Sofia Sewing / Tina Pisnik
Upset or contender watch >
Sofia Sewing / Tina Pisnik is the name the model surfaces outside the obvious final path. Worth watching before prices harden.
Markets Official bracket
Mixed Doubles
Anna Bright / Hayden Patriquin Is the Model's Pick
Projected final: Anna Bright / Hayden Patriquin over Jade Kawamoto / Ben Johns at 51.3% model confidence. That grades as thin edge, so treat the draw with the right amount of uncertainty.
Winner
Anna Bright / Hayden Patriquin
SR 1911 · Thin edge final confidence >
The model projects Anna Bright / Hayden Patriquin through a final against Jade Kawamoto / Ben Johns with 51.3% final-match confidence. This is a probability read, not a certainty.
Finalist
Jade Kawamoto / Ben Johns
Projected runner-up path >
Jade Kawamoto / Ben Johns reaches the final in the model path. This is a clean name to track for market questions and upset exposure.
Semifinalists
Anna Leigh Waters / Noe Khlif / Jorja Johnson / Federico Staksrud
Late-round pressure spots >
Anna Leigh Waters / Noe Khlif and Jorja Johnson / Federico Staksrud appear in the projected semifinal path, which is where the bracket starts producing useful market tension.
Dark Horse
Rachel Rohrabacher / Christian Alshon
Upset or contender watch >
Rachel Rohrabacher / Christian Alshon is the name the model surfaces outside the obvious final path. Worth watching before prices harden.
Markets Official bracket
Sheet Rating™ v2.3 · Recalibrated: loading...